MCP profile Review candidate Next best action: Check evidence, trust, and trial before install

~/agentstaffer / mcp / npm-awaithumans

awaithumans

HITL infrastructure for AI agents. Your agent calls awaitHuman(), a human reviews via Slack/email/dashboard, agent resumes with a typed response.

npmworkflowCoding & DevelopmentMCPHTTPSDKMCP clientsClaude Desktop

Fit & Capabilities

What this candidate is suited for, how the fit score breaks down, and which protocols or skills are visible.

71 / 100 fit

Fit score71 / 100Capability fit: 100/100

Best for4 usesTeams standardizing agent tool access through MCP

Protocols3 visibleMCP / HTTP

Capabilities8 listedWorkflow automation / RAG

Fit detailOpen the full fit breakdown.

Capability fit100 / 100

Coding & Development

Trust70 / 100

Needs review

Integration readiness75 / 100

MCP ready

Maintenance signal0 / 100

Source review needed

Community proof50 / 100

70 / 100 external reputation

Trial readiness77 / 100

Run a small code review trial

Best for4 uses

Teams standardizing agent tool access through MCP
Operators building repeatable agent workflows
Engineering teams testing coding agents or skill packs
Builders comparing multi-agent orchestration patterns

Protocols3

MCPHTTPSDK

Capabilities8

Workflow automationRAGMulti-agent orchestrationCoding assistanceComputer useFinancial analysis

Evidence

Source traction, reputation reviews, verified resources, and missing signals grouped once for the profile decision.

4 quality signals

Source tractionSource review neededLast activity

Reputation & reviews4 external0 community / 0 trials

Verified resources3 / 3 presentMCP config available

Evidence gaps4 openOpen evidence detail before promotion

Evidence detailOpen the full evidence ledger.

Source traction

Last activity: 2026-05-24

Reputation & reviews

External reputation: 4 signals attached
External score: 70 / 100
Community reviews: 0
Trial runs: 0

Verified resources

Source URL: Present
Install manifest: Present
MCP config: Present

Evidence gaps

Sandbox trial: Not recorded
License: Unknown
Community review: Not recorded
Permissions: Review required

Risk & Safety

Risk signals, permission requirements, and required checks before install, trial, hire, or production use.

Trial review

Risk signals

No community evaluationmedium

AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Permission-sensitive workflowmedium

The listing may touch accounts, browsers, payment, credentials, or other sensitive surfaces.

Unknown licensemedium

License metadata is missing, so commercial or redistribution rights need manual review.

Marketplace review notereview

matches:agent,agents,agentic,assistant,workflow,automation

Marketplace review notereview

protocol:mcp,http,sdk

Safety requirements

Sandbox workspacerequired

Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.

Node.js and npmrequired

Required to run awaithumans.

MCP-capable clientrequired

Use Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, or another client that can load MCP server configs.

Browser or desktop permissionsconditional

Grant only the minimum UI or device access needed for the first trial.

Temporary credentialsconditional

Use throwaway API keys or scoped test credentials. Do not start with production secrets.

Quality evidence

Protocol metadatapositive

MCP, HTTP, SDK support detected.

Ready install pathpositive

AgentStaffer can infer awaithumans.

Third-party reputationpositive

4 third-party signals with score 70/100.

Recent source activitypositive

Updated about 145 days ago.

Required checks

Confirm licensereview

License metadata is missing from the imported profile.

Review permissionsrequired

Use minimum viable access and temporary credentials for the first run.

Collect user evaluationreview

No AgentStaffer community review is attached yet.

Run sandbox trialrequired

Create a narrow, observable trial before install, hire, or promotion.

Security verdict

Install path is visible, but review permissions and run a sandbox task first.

Open trust review

Safe action rule

This is an evidence-based AgentStaffer review summary, not a malware guarantee. Always inspect source, install manifest, permissions, and trial results before local execution.

Installation

One install command/config, with client-specific notes kept short.

MCP ready

Command

npx -y awaithumans

Setup guide

MCP config

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "awaithumans": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "awaithumans"
      ],
      "env": {
        "AGENTSTAFFER_PROFILE": "https://agentstaffer.com/mcp/npm-awaithumans"
      }
    }
  }
}

MCP config

Client notes

Claude Desktop

Copy the MCP config from this page or download the MCP config file.

Cursor / VS Code

Add the downloaded MCP config to your editor MCP settings.

Dify / n8n / Langflow

Download the AgentStaffer install file and attach it to your workflow notes.

Local / Terminal

npx -y awaithumans

Safety

Run in a sandbox or throwaway workspace.
Use non-production data and temporary credentials.
Capture output, logs, install friction, and any permission requests.

Trial Plan

Status: Not started. Record trial evidence before production promotion.

not started

Run a small code review trial

Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.

Expected output

A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.

Success criteria

Finds concrete issues
Avoids broad rewrites
Explains tradeoffs
Can be evaluated without secrets

Required review

Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
Node.js and npm: Required to run awaithumans.
MCP-capable client: Use Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, or another client that can load MCP server configs.
Browser or desktop permissions: Grant only the minimum UI or device access needed for the first trial.
Temporary credentials: Use throwaway API keys or scoped test credentials. Do not start with production secrets.

Promotion rule

Blocked until trial evidence exists

Open trial workspace Trial JSON

Lifecycle & Alternatives

Human-readable review history and nearby alternatives stay compact here; full events and graph live in the complete review materials.

0 records

Reviews & HistoryReview history

Indexed for hiring review

Candidate entered AgentStaffer as a public marketplace listing.

2026-07-14

Current lifecycle stage

Run Trial: Start with a sandbox trial before shortlisting or hiring.

2026-07-14

Latest sandbox trial

No sandbox trial has been recorded, so hire/install decisions should stay conservative.

Pending

Latest community review

No community review has been attached yet.

Pending

Similar CandidatesAlternatives

@apijack/core

Jack into any OpenAPI spec and rip a full-featured CLI with AI-agentic workflow automation

66/100 fit

heymrun/heym

Self-hosted AI workflow automation platform with visual canvas, agents, RAG, HITL, MCP, and observability in one runtime.

75/100 fit

iflow-mcp-sixhq-overture

MCP Server for Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, Copilot, Github Copilot, Windsurf - Visual AI Agent Plan Execution, Approval Workflow, Plan Visualization, Agent Orchestration. See what your AI is thinking before it writes code. Works with Claude, GPT, Gemini,

66/100 fit

overture-mcp

66/100 fit

AntonOsika/gpt-engineer

CLI platform to experiment with codegen. Precursor to: https://lovable.dev

81/100 fit

Cline – #1 on OpenRouter

Autonomous coding agent right in your IDE, capable of creating/editing files, executing commands, using the browser, and more with your permission every step of the way.

81/100 fit

Decision files

Review materials

Scan the decision path first; expand only when the recommendation needs source files, history, alternatives, or dossier detail.

Open profile JSON

Decision path

Profile JSONStartEvidence JSONSignalsTrust JSONRiskMaterialsAll files

01Decision basis

Start with the profile record, then verify score, evidence, and trust before shortlisting.

Profile, score, evidence, trust

02Trial readiness

Use the sandbox plan and setup guide before copying commands or approving local setup.

Trial plan and setup

03Governance trail

Check lifecycle history, alternatives, and the dossier before hire, promotion, or credentials.

History, alternatives, dossier

Full file listOpen ordered resources when the decision needs more evidence.

9 required records stay in review order; companion links are grouped for context.

Required recordsRead these before install, hire, promotion, or credential access.

Profile recordIdentity and resource contract Score detailFit and recommendation score Evidence ledgerSignals, sources, and gaps Trust reviewPermissions and safety Trial guideSandbox task and criteria Setup guideInstall method and client notes Review historyPast reviews and changes AlternativesNearby candidates Readable dossierMarkdown decision brief

Companion links8 supporting records for context and discovery.

Short summaryShort summary MCP configClient configuration ComparisonSide-by-side context Visibility reportVendor claim and evidence gaps claim.jsonCompanion link Resource mapSite resource map Site contextShared review context SitemapDiscovery index

Review order

01Decision recordIdentity, summary, and required review materials
02Score detailFit, recommendation, and decision scoring
03Evidence ledgerSource, reputation, and review gaps
04Full file listEvidence, setup, trust, trial, and history files

Use the compact page for quick review; open the full file list before recommending hire, install, promotion, or credential access.

Vendor path

Claim, verify, report, then feature

Vendor ownership and paid visibility options stay below the review package; evidence scores stay independent.

Start claim

Next stepClaim owner path

Submit public maintainer proof so corrections and paid visibility can be reviewed.

ReportEvidence gaps first

Open vendor visibility report

GuardrailExposure only

Paid placement can influence eligible exposure surfaces only after verification; trust, fit, safety, trial, and promotion scores remain evidence based.

done Indexed

The profile is discoverable with public profile, score, evidence, trust, install, and trial resources.

Open profile

current Claim owner path

Submit public maintainer proof so corrections and paid visibility can be reviewed.

Start claim

locked Verify evidence

Ownership, install metadata, safety posture, trial evidence, and public proof are checked independently.

Open visibility report

current Read visibility report

Use the report to see crawlable surfaces, comparison presence, evidence gaps, and the next fix.

View report

locked Apply for featured visibility

Featured exposure is available only after claim or verification readiness, and never changes scores.

Complete claim first

Commercial products and availabilityOpen claim, verification, report, and featured visibility options.

Claim profilefree

available · Start claim

Start claim

Verification reviewoptional paid

locked · Claim first

Claim first

Visibility reportoptional paid

available · Open report

Open report

Featured visibilitypaid

locked · Complete verification

Complete verification

Review route: OpenAI review tools can start with openai.json; otherwise use site context and agent inventory before opening the finalist's complete review materials before install, hire, or promotion.