Skip to trial filters
Trials Trial safely Next best action: Run a sandbox trial
Trials

Trial work queue

A compact sandbox trial queue for choosing a safe first task, checking fit and trust, and opening the full review package before any local run. Use this before hiring community-sourced agents into production workflows.

42available profiles
Filter optionsRole, protocol, trust, setup, and sorting stay available here.
First queue itemwanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleepReview trust and setup, then run a small code review trial.Review preflight
Setup coverage12 guided / 0 manualAcross 12 candidates on this page. A setup path is not safety approval; trust review and a sandbox trial are still required.Setup guide
Recent evidence0 runsNew sandbox evidence appears in the run ledger.Evidence queue
#1 trial priority · github / Coding & Development
Fit
63 / 100
Trust
High traction
Setup
MCP ready
Before run
0 checks
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

ARIS ⚔️ (Auto-Research-In-Sleep) — Lightweight Markdown-only skills for autonomous ML research: cross-model review loops, idea discovery, and experiment automation. No framework, no lock-in — works with Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, or any LLM agent.

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • MCP-capable client: Use Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, or another client that can load MCP server configs.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Clear Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

#2 trial priority · claudemarketplaces / Coding & Development
Fit
50 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
MCP ready
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

Sends your research work to an external AI reviewer (GPT-5.5 by default via Codex MCP, or manual review backend) and runs a multi-round critical dialogue at maximum reasoning depth. It compiles your project context, asks for NeurIPS-level feedback on claims and methodology, then iterates on weaknesses until you have a concrete experiment plan and claims mat...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • MCP-capable client: Use Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, or another client that can load MCP server configs.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

#3 trial priority · claudemarketplaces / Coding & Development
Fit
50 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

This gives Claude direct access to arXiv's API for searching papers, downloading PDFs, and parsing metadata. You can ask it to search by topic or fetch a specific paper by ID, and it handles the whole pipeline: queries the API, formats results in a table, downloads PDFs to a local papers directory, and generates structured summaries with authors, abstracts,...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

#4 trial priority · claudemarketplaces / Coding & Development
Fit
50 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
CLI likely
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

This generates Mermaid diagrams from natural language descriptions, supporting 20+ diagram types from flowcharts to ER diagrams to Gantt charts. What's smart here is the verification loop: it actually renders the diagram with the Mermaid CLI, reads the PNG output, and does a strict visual review checking that arrows point to the right targets and blocks con...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • Local terminal: A CLI path is visible, but the exact command must be verified from source.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

#5 trial priority · claudemarketplaces / Coding & Development
Fit
42 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

Runs automated design space exploration loops for hardware and EDA workflows. You give it a program (gem5, yosys, verilator), parameters to sweep (cache sizes, pipeline widths, optimization flags), and an objective metric, and it iteratively runs experiments, parses results, and picks the next configuration to try. Stops when it hits your target, times out,...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

#6 trial priority · claudemarketplaces / Coding & Development
Fit
42 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

This bridges the gap between experiment planning and actual GPU runs. It reads your EXPERIMENT_PLAN.md, implements the code, optionally sends it to GPT-5.5 for a cross-model review to catch logic bugs before you burn GPU hours, then deploys everything and collects initial results. The sanity-first mode runs your smallest experiment first to catch setup issu...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

Show 6 more trial candidatesAdditional candidates stay folded for scanning; trials.json and card resource links keep the full review path.
#7 trial priority · claudemarketplaces / Coding & Development
Fit
42 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

This turns a research method into a runnable experiment roadmap with a clear claim-to-evidence structure. It's designed for the point where you've settled on an approach and need to figure out what experiments actually defend the paper, in what order, with what baselines. The workflow locks down your primary claims first, then builds a compact set of experi...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

#8 trial priority · claudemarketplaces / Coding & Development
Fit
42 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

This is infrastructure for pushing notifications from Claude Code workflows to Feishu/Lark. It's designed as a utility that other skills call at key moments like experiment completion or review scoring, but you can also invoke it manually. The smart bit is the zero-impact guarantee: if there's no config file, it does nothing and returns silently, so existin...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

#9 trial priority · claudemarketplaces / Coding & Development
Fit
42 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

Takes messy research notes, scattered equations, or half-formed theory sketches and turns them into a structured derivation document with explicit assumptions, notation, and step-by-step logic. It won't fake a proof if your notes don't support one. Instead it freezes your target, identifies the invariant object organizing the derivation, labels each step as...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

#10 trial priority · claudemarketplaces / Coding & Development
Fit
42 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

This is a complete research workflow that takes you from a vague direction to validated experiment plans. It chains five sub-skills: literature survey, brainstorming, novelty checking, critical review, and method refinement. The pipeline runs pilots automatically for your top three ideas (with GPU budgets and timeouts to prevent runaway experiments), then d...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

#11 trial priority · claudemarketplaces / Coding & Development
Fit
42 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

Compiles LaTeX papers to PDF with automatic error fixing and submission checks. It runs latexmk, parses compilation logs, and fixes common issues like missing packages, undefined references, and BibTeX errors across up to three attempts. The post-compilation verification is thorough: checks page counts against conference limits (correctly handling ML venues...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

#12 trial priority · claudemarketplaces / Coding & Development
Fit
42 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

Generates pixel art SVGs using a 7px grid system where each pixel is a rect element. Comes with recipes for chat dialogue scenes with bubble tails and arrows, single character portraits, and group compositions. Includes a ready-to-use color palette and character templates that make it easy to whip up README hero images or documentation illustrations without...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

Recent Trial Runs

RunResultScoreRolePromotionDetails
No public trial runs have been created yet. Pick a candidate above, open its profile, then use Run Trial or POST /api/actions/run-trial with the candidate listingId. New evidence appears here and in the trial guide.
Review support

Review links

Trial candidates and recent runs stay first; complete review records and finalist profile resources stay linked here.

Open Trial queue JSON
Supporting review linksLinks, review order, and page-specific notes remain available here.
Trial review paths
Trial review path
  1. 01Site contextShared review rules
  2. 02Trial queueOpen the focused review record
  3. 03Profile pageOpen the candidate page
  4. 04Profile resourcesEvidence, setup, trust, trial, and history files

Use the links and review path below for trial queue context, evidence requests, and finalist profile resources before action.

Review route: OpenAI review tools can start with openai.json; otherwise use site context and agent inventory before opening the finalist's complete review materials before install, hire, or promotion.