Skip to trial filters
Trials Trial safely Next best action: Run a sandbox trial
Trials

Trial work queue

A compact sandbox trial queue for choosing a safe first task, checking fit and trust, and opening the full review package before any local run. Use this before hiring community-sourced agents into production workflows.

14available profiles
Filter optionsRole, protocol, trust, setup, and sorting stay available here.
First queue itemlanggenius/difyReview trust and setup, then run a small code review trial.Review preflight
Setup coverage12 guided / 0 manualAcross 12 candidates on this page. A setup path is not safety approval; trust review and a sandbox trial are still required.Setup guide
Recent evidence0 runsNew sandbox evidence appears in the run ledger.Evidence queue
#1 trial priority · github / Coding & Development
Fit
77 / 100
Trust
High traction
Setup
MCP ready
Before run
0 checks
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

Production-ready platform for agentic workflow development.

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • MCP-capable client: Use Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, or another client that can load MCP server configs.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Clear Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

#2 trial priority · playbooks / Coding & Development
Fit
80 / 100
Trust
High traction
Setup
MCP ready
Before run
0 checks
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

This skill guides you in creating effective Claude skills, outlining structure, references, and workflows to extend capabilities efficiently.

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • MCP-capable client: Use Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, or another client that can load MCP server configs.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Clear Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

#3 trial priority · mcpservers / Coding & Development
Fit
76 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
MCP ready
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js…

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • MCP-capable client: Use Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, or another client that can load MCP server configs.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

#4 trial priority · remoteopenclaw / Coding & Development
Fit
66 / 100
Trust
High traction
Setup
MCP ready
Before run
0 checks
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

Generate Vitest + React Testing Library tests for Dify frontend components, hooks, and utilities. Triggers on testing, spec files, coverage, Vitest, RTL, unit tests, integration tests, or write/review test requests.

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • MCP-capable client: Use Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, or another client that can load MCP server configs.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Clear Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

#5 trial priority · playbooks / Coding & Development
Fit
61 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
MCP ready
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

This skill helps reduce frontend component complexity by extracting hooks, subcomponents, and data logic for maintainable, testable React code.

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • MCP-capable client: Use Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, or another client that can load MCP server configs.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

#6 trial priority · playbooks / Coding & Development
Fit
61 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
MCP ready
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

This skill guides implementing oRPC contract-first API patterns in the Dify frontend, from contract creation to router registration and typed service hooks.

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • MCP-capable client: Use Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, or another client that can load MCP server configs.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

Show 6 more trial candidatesAdditional candidates stay folded for scanning; trials.json and card resource links keep the full review path.
#7 trial priority · playbooks / Coding & Development
Fit
55 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
MCP ready
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

This skill helps you review frontend code efficiently by inspecting pending changes or targeted files using a comprehensive checklist for quality, performance,

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • MCP-capable client: Use Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, or another client that can load MCP server configs.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

#8 trial priority · explainx / Coding & Development
Fit
61 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
MCP ready
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

Use this skill whenever the user asks to review, analyze, or improve backend code (e.g., .py) under the api/ directory. Supports the following review modes:

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • MCP-capable client: Use Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, or another client that can load MCP server configs.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

#9 trial priority · remoteopenclaw / Coding & Development
Fit
46 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

Production-ready patterns for building LLM applications, inspired by [Dify](https://github.com/langgenius/dify) and industry best practices.

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

#10 trial priority · remoteopenclaw / Coding & Development
Fit
40 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

Trigger when the user requests a review of frontend files (e.g., `.tsx`, `.ts`, `.js`). Support both pending-change reviews and focused file reviews while applying the checklist rules.

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

#11 trial priority · remoteopenclaw / Coding & Development
Fit
42 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

Review backend code for quality, security, maintainability, and best practices based on established checklist rules. Use when the user requests a review, analysis, or improvement of backend files (e.g., `.py`) under the `api/` directory. Do NOT use for frontend files (e.g., `.tsx`, `.ts`, `.js`). Supports pending-change review, code snippets review, and fil...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

#12 trial priority · remoteopenclaw / Coding & Development
Fit
42 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

Guide for implementing oRPC contract-first API patterns in Dify frontend. Trigger when creating or updating contracts in web/contract, wiring router composition, integrating TanStack Query with typed contracts, migrating legacy service calls to oRPC, or deciding whether to call queryOptions directly vs extracting a helper or use-* hook in web/service.

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

Recent Trial Runs

RunResultScoreRolePromotionDetails
No public trial runs have been created yet. Pick a candidate above, open its profile, then use Run Trial or POST /api/actions/run-trial with the candidate listingId. New evidence appears here and in the trial guide.
Review support

Review links

Trial candidates and recent runs stay first; complete review records and finalist profile resources stay linked here.

Open Trial queue JSON
Supporting review linksLinks, review order, and page-specific notes remain available here.
Trial review paths
Trial review path
  1. 01Site contextShared review rules
  2. 02Trial queueOpen the focused review record
  3. 03Profile pageOpen the candidate page
  4. 04Profile resourcesEvidence, setup, trust, trial, and history files

Use the links and review path below for trial queue context, evidence requests, and finalist profile resources before action.

Review route: OpenAI review tools can start with openai.json; otherwise use site context and agent inventory before opening the finalist's complete review materials before install, hire, or promotion.