Skip to trial filters
~/agentstafferAgentStaffer

Find, trial, compare, and govern AI agents before hiring

Trials Trial safely Next best action: Run a sandbox trial
Trials

Trial work queue

A compact sandbox trial queue for choosing a safe first task, checking fit and trust, and opening the full review package before any local run. Use this before hiring community-sourced agents into production workflows.

9available profiles
Filter optionsRole, protocol, trust, setup, and sorting stay available here.
First queue itemmmx-cliReview trust and setup, then run a small code review trial.Review preflight
Setup coverage9 guided / 0 manualAcross 9 candidates on this page. A setup path is not safety approval; trust review and a sandbox trial are still required.Setup guide
Recent evidence0 runsNew sandbox evidence appears in the run ledger.Evidence queue
#1 trial priority · claudemarketplaces / Coding & Development
Fit
64 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
CLI likely
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

This is a Swiss Army knife for MiniMax's AI platform: text, images, video, speech synthesis with 300+ voices, and music generation all from one CLI. You'll reach for it when you need to prototype multimedia workflows or automate content pipelines without juggling multiple APIs. The speech-2.8-hd model and music-2.6 engine (lyrics, covers, instrumentals) are...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • Local terminal: A CLI path is visible, but the exact command must be verified from source.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

Review & run trial Open profile
Review links
Profile JSON Trial JSON Setup JSON Trust JSON
#2 trial priority · claudemarketplaces / Coding & Development
Fit
59 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

Need to compare multiple LLMs or agents but don't have test data ready? This generates test queries from your task description, collects responses from all your endpoints, creates evaluation rubrics on the fly, then runs pairwise comparisons with position-bias swapping to produce win-rate rankings. It's built on OpenJudge's AutoArenaPipeline and handles the...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

Review & run trial Open profile
Review links
Profile JSON Trial JSON Setup JSON Trust JSON
#3 trial priority · claudemarketplaces / Coding & Development
Fit
53 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

This is a multi-stage academic paper reviewer that runs OpenJudge's pipeline on PDFs or LaTeX sources. It checks for mathematical errors, scores papers 1-6 on quality and novelty, verifies BibTeX entries against CrossRef and arXiv, and outputs a structured markdown report. Covers 10 disciplines from computer science to social sciences. The pipeline uses vis...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

Review & run trial Open profile
Review links
Profile JSON Trial JSON Setup JSON Trust JSON
#4 trial priority · claudemarketplaces / Coding & Development
Fit
53 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

This handles the reward signal plumbing for RLHF and RLAIF workflows using the OpenJudge library. You get a clear decision tree upfront: pointwise rewards for verifiable tasks like code or math, pairwise tournaments for subjective stuff like instruction following, and pairwise comparisons when you need preference pairs for DPO. The tournament approach for G...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

Review & run trial Open profile
Review links
Profile JSON Trial JSON Setup JSON Trust JSON
#5 trial priority · claudemarketplaces / Coding & Development
Fit
51 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

Most skill searches assume you need one thing, but real work usually needs three or four capabilities stitched together. This skill takes a complex ask like "bu

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

Review & run trial Open profile
Review links
Profile JSON Trial JSON Setup JSON Trust JSON
#6 trial priority · claudemarketplaces / Coding & Development
Fit
51 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

This benchmark verifies whether LLMs are citing real academic papers or making them up. It hits Crossref, PubMed, arXiv, and DBLP to check every reference your model returns, then scores hallucination rate, per-field accuracy (title, author, year, DOI), and discipline breakdown. You can run it with or without tool augmentation (ReAct plus web search). The p...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

Review & run trial Open profile
Review links
Profile JSON Trial JSON Setup JSON Trust JSON
Show 3 more trial candidatesAdditional candidates stay folded for scanning; trials.json and card resource links keep the full review path.
#7 trial priority · claudemarketplaces / Coding & Development
Fit
62 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
CLI likely
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

Checks every entry in your BibTeX file against CrossRef, arXiv, and DBLP to catch hallucinated or fabricated citations. You get a three-tier verdict per reference: verified, suspect (field mismatches), or not found. The report breaks down exactly what's wrong at the field level, which is helpful when you're reviewing AI-generated bibliographies or auditing...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • Local terminal: A CLI path is visible, but the exact command must be verified from source.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

Review & run trial Open profile
Review links
Profile JSON Trial JSON Setup JSON Trust JSON
#8 trial priority · claudemarketplaces / Coding & Development
Fit
56 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

This is a self-contained Python script that runs nine weighted checks to detect whether an API endpoint actually serves genuine Claude or just wraps someone else's model. It mirrors the claude-verify project's methodology, looking for signature fields, extended thinking blocks, cache_creation tokens, and identity keywords that real Claude returns but wrappe...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

Review & run trial Open profile
Review links
Profile JSON Trial JSON Setup JSON Trust JSON
#9 trial priority · claudemarketplaces / Coding & Development
Fit
48 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

If you're building LLM evaluation pipelines, this wraps the OpenJudge framework into something Claude can use directly. You get pre-built graders for correctness, hallucination, and relevance, plus the ability to define custom scoring functions or use other LLMs as judges. The GradingRunner handles batch evaluation with configurable concurrency, and you can...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

Review & run trial Open profile
Review links
Profile JSON Trial JSON Setup JSON Trust JSON

Recent Trial Runs

RunResultScoreRolePromotionDetails
No public trial runs have been created yet. Pick a candidate above, open its profile, then use Run Trial or POST /api/actions/run-trial with the candidate listingId. New evidence appears here and in the trial guide.
Review support

Review links

Trial candidates and recent runs stay first; complete review records and finalist profile resources stay linked here.

Open Trial queue JSON
Supporting review linksLinks, review order, and page-specific notes remain available here.
Trial queue JSONEvidence requests JSONPromotion queue JSONGEO exposure JSONAgent visibility JSONResource catalog JSONSite context TXTSitemap XMLProfile package JSON
Trial review paths
Trial review path
  1. 01Site contextShared review rules
  2. 02Trial queueOpen the focused review record
  3. 03Profile pageOpen the candidate page
  4. 04Profile resourcesEvidence, setup, trust, trial, and history files

Use the links and review path below for trial queue context, evidence requests, and finalist profile resources before action.

Review route: OpenAI review tools can start with openai.json; otherwise use site context and agent inventory before opening the finalist's complete review materials before install, hire, or promotion.