Skip to trial filters
~/agentstafferAgentStaffer

Find, trial, compare, and govern AI agents before hiring

Trials Trial safely Next best action: Run a sandbox trial
Trials

Trial work queue

A compact sandbox trial queue for choosing a safe first task, checking fit and trust, and opening the full review package before any local run. Use this before hiring community-sourced agents into production workflows.

8available profiles
Filter optionsRole, protocol, trust, setup, and sorting stay available here.
First queue itemarxiv-paper-reviews skill by openclaw/skillsReview trust and setup, then run a small code review trial.Review preflight
Setup coverage8 guided / 0 manualAcross 8 candidates on this page. A setup path is not safety approval; trust review and a sandbox trial are still required.Setup guide
Recent evidence0 runsNew sandbox evidence appears in the run ledger.Evidence queue
#1 trial priority · playbooks / Coding & Development
Fit
61 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
MCP ready
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

This skill interacts with the arXiv Crawler API to fetch papers, view reviews, submit comments, and import papers by arXiv URL.

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • MCP-capable client: Use Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, or another client that can load MCP server configs.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

Review & run trial Open profile
Review links
Profile JSON Trial JSON Setup JSON Trust JSON
#2 trial priority · github / Coding & Development
Fit
63 / 100
Trust
High traction
Setup
MCP ready
Before run
0 checks
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

ARIS ⚔️ (Auto-Research-In-Sleep) — Lightweight Markdown-only skills for autonomous ML research: cross-model review loops, idea discovery, and experiment automation. No framework, no lock-in — works with Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, or any LLM agent.

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • MCP-capable client: Use Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, or another client that can load MCP server configs.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Clear Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

Review & run trial Open profile
Review links
Profile JSON Trial JSON Setup JSON Trust JSON
#3 trial priority · claudemarketplaces / Coding & Development
Fit
53 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

This is a multi-stage academic paper reviewer that runs OpenJudge's pipeline on PDFs or LaTeX sources. It checks for mathematical errors, scores papers 1-6 on quality and novelty, verifies BibTeX entries against CrossRef and arXiv, and outputs a structured markdown report. Covers 10 disciplines from computer science to social sciences. The pipeline uses vis...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

Review & run trial Open profile
Review links
Profile JSON Trial JSON Setup JSON Trust JSON
#4 trial priority · remoteopenclaw / Coding & Development
Fit
44 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

Use this skill when the user wants a systematic literature review, survey, or synthesis across multiple academic papers on a topic. Also covers annotated bibliographies and cross-paper comparisons. Searches arXiv and outputs reports in APA, IEEE, or BibTeX format. Not for single-paper tasks — use academic-paper-review for reviewing one paper.

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

Review & run trial Open profile
Review links
Profile JSON Trial JSON Setup JSON Trust JSON
#5 trial priority · remoteopenclaw / Coding & Development
Fit
42 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

Review & run trial Open profile
Review links
Profile JSON Trial JSON Setup JSON Trust JSON
#6 trial priority · remoteopenclaw / Coding & Development
Fit
36 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript re...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

Review & run trial Open profile
Review links
Profile JSON Trial JSON Setup JSON Trust JSON
Show 2 more trial candidatesAdditional candidates stay folded for scanning; trials.json and card resource links keep the full review path.
#7 trial priority · remoteopenclaw / Coding & Development
Fit
34 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

Use this skill when the user requests to review, analyze, critique, or summarize academic papers, research articles, preprints, or scientific publications. Supports comprehensive structured reviews covering methodology assessment, contribution evaluation, literature positioning, and constructive feedback generation. Trigger on queries involving paper URLs,...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

Review & run trial Open profile
Review links
Profile JSON Trial JSON Setup JSON Trust JSON
#8 trial priority · claudemarketplaces / Coding & Development
Fit
39 / 100
Trust
Needs review
Setup
Source guide
Before run
1 check
Top risk

No community evaluationAgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Full readiness snapshotCandidate summary and risk context stay available here.

This walks you through a structured self-review before you submit your own academic paper. It's not for peer reviewing someone else's work. The core is a five-aspect checklist covering contribution sufficiency, writing clarity, results quality, testing completeness, and method design flaws. What makes it interesting is the counterintuitive protocol: simulat...

Top risk

No community evaluation: AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Trial task Run a small code review trial
Input
Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.
Expected output
A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.
Permissions & setup
  • Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.
  • License review: License metadata is missing from the current public profile.
Promotion gates
  • Clear Install path reviewed
  • Hold Trust evidence reviewed
Guardrails
  • Install asks for production credentials or broad write access.
  • Source or package cannot be verified from profile evidence.

Create evidence with POST /api/actions/run-trial. Keep the card short; open the full checklist in the trial JSON.

Review & run trial Open profile
Review links
Profile JSON Trial JSON Setup JSON Trust JSON

Recent Trial Runs

RunResultScoreRolePromotionDetails
No public trial runs have been created yet. Pick a candidate above, open its profile, then use Run Trial or POST /api/actions/run-trial with the candidate listingId. New evidence appears here and in the trial guide.
Review support

Review links

Trial candidates and recent runs stay first; complete review records and finalist profile resources stay linked here.

Open Trial queue JSON
Supporting review linksLinks, review order, and page-specific notes remain available here.
Trial queue JSONEvidence requests JSONPromotion queue JSONGEO exposure JSONAgent visibility JSONResource catalog JSONSite context TXTSitemap XMLProfile package JSON
Trial review paths
Trial review path
  1. 01Site contextShared review rules
  2. 02Trial queueOpen the focused review record
  3. 03Profile pageOpen the candidate page
  4. 04Profile resourcesEvidence, setup, trust, trial, and history files

Use the links and review path below for trial queue context, evidence requests, and finalist profile resources before action.

Review route: OpenAI review tools can start with openai.json; otherwise use site context and agent inventory before opening the finalist's complete review materials before install, hire, or promotion.