Agent profile Review candidate Next best action: Check evidence, trust, and trial before install

~/agentstaffer / agents / github-microsoft-openrca

microsoft/OpenRCA

[ICLR'25] OpenRCA: Can Large Language Models Locate the Root Cause of Software Failures?

githubmodelCoding & DevelopmentSource runtime

Fit & Capabilities

What this candidate is suited for, how the fit score breaks down, and which protocols or skills are visible.

20 / 100 fit

Fit score20 / 100Capability fit: 14/100

Best for1 usesManual evaluation before assigning to a production role

ProtocolsReviewManual review

CapabilitiesReviewManual review

Fit detailOpen the full fit breakdown.

Capability fit14 / 100

Coding & Development

Trust50 / 100

Needs review

Integration readiness0 / 100

Source guide

Maintenance signal46 / 100

349 stars

Community proof50 / 100

Community review pending

Trial readiness18 / 100

Run a small code review trial

Best for1 uses

Manual evaluation before assigning to a production role

Protocolsreview

Manual review

Capabilitiesreview

Manual review

Evidence

Source traction, reputation reviews, verified resources, and missing signals grouped once for the profile decision.

1 quality signals

Source traction349 starsStars

Reputation & reviewsPending0 community / 0 trials

Verified resources2 / 3 presentMCP config not inferred

Evidence gaps3 openOpen evidence detail before promotion

Evidence detailOpen the full evidence ledger.

Source traction

Stars: 349
Forks: 42
Last activity: 2026-04-14

Reputation & reviews

External reputation: Pending; source traction tracked separately
Community reviews: 0
Trial runs: 0
Traction evidence: See source traction card

Verified resources

Source URL: Present
Install manifest: Present
MCP config: Not inferred

Evidence gaps

External reputation: Pending; source traction tracked separately
Sandbox trial: Not recorded
Community review: Not recorded

Risk & Safety

Risk signals, permission requirements, and required checks before install, trial, hire, or production use.

Manual review

Risk signals

No community evaluationmedium

AgentStaffer users have not submitted a review yet.

Third-party reputation pendingmedium

Third-party review or discussion signal is pending. Source stars, downloads, likes, and activity are tracked separately as source traction.

Unknown integration protocolmedium

No MCP, SDK, CLI, HTTP, or A2A support is clearly visible.

Marketplace review notereview

matches:agent

Safety requirements

Sandbox workspacerequired

Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.

Quality evidence

License visiblepositive

License metadata: MIT.

Required checks

Verify install sourcerequired

Open install.json and source docs before running any command.

Collect user evaluationreview

No AgentStaffer community review is attached yet.

Run sandbox trialrequired

Create a narrow, observable trial before install, hire, or promotion.

Security verdict

Evidence is thin. Read source, license, and requirements before trial.

Open trust review

Safe action rule

This is an evidence-based AgentStaffer review summary, not a malware guarantee. Always inspect source, install manifest, permissions, and trial results before local execution.

Installation

One install command/config, with client-specific notes kept short.

Source guide

Command

Review this AgentStaffer install manifest before installing: https://agentstaffer.com/agents/github-microsoft-openrca/install.json

Setup guide

Client notes

Claude Desktop

Download the install file and open the source documentation.

Cursor / VS Code

Open the source documentation and find the editor integration steps.

Dify / n8n / Langflow

Download the AgentStaffer install file and attach it to your workflow notes.

Local / Terminal

Use the source repository instructions.

Safety

Run in a sandbox or throwaway workspace.
Use non-production data and temporary credentials.
Capture output, logs, install friction, and any permission requests.

Trial Plan

Status: Not started. Record trial evidence before production promotion.

not started

Run a small code review trial

Give the agent one low-risk issue or one small pull request and ask for defects, tests, and a patch plan.

Expected output

A concise review with reproducible findings, changed-file scope, and test suggestions.

Success criteria

Finds concrete issues
Avoids broad rewrites
Explains tradeoffs
Can be evaluated without secrets

Required review

Sandbox workspace: Run the first trial in a throwaway directory or isolated environment.

Promotion rule

Blocked until trial evidence exists

Open trial workspace Trial JSON

Lifecycle & Alternatives

Human-readable review history and nearby alternatives stay compact here; full events and graph live in the complete review materials.

0 records

Reviews & HistoryReview history

Indexed for hiring review

Candidate entered AgentStaffer as a public marketplace listing.

2026-07-14

Current lifecycle stage

Run Trial: Start with a sandbox trial before shortlisting or hiring.

2026-07-14

Latest sandbox trial

No sandbox trial has been recorded, so hire/install decisions should stay conservative.

Pending

Latest community review

No community review has been attached yet.

Pending

Similar CandidatesAlternatives

setup skill by assistant-ui/skills

Setup and configure assistant-ui in a project. Use when installing packages, configuring runtimes, or troubleshooting setup issues.

70/100 fit

assistant-ui skill by assistant-ui/skills

Guide for assistant-ui library - AI chat UI components. Use when asking about architecture, debugging, or understanding the codebase.

70/100 fit

ComposioHQ/composio

Composio powers 1000+ toolkits, tool search, context management, authentication, and a sandboxed workbench to help you build AI agents that turn intent into action.

80/100 fit

AntonOsika/gpt-engineer

CLI platform to experiment with codegen. Precursor to: https://lovable.dev

81/100 fit

topoteretes/cognee

Memory control plane for AI Agents in 6 lines of code

80/100 fit

langgenius/dify

Production-ready platform for agentic workflow development.

77/100 fit

Decision files

Review materials

Scan the decision path first; expand only when the recommendation needs source files, history, alternatives, or dossier detail.

Open profile JSON

Decision path

Profile JSONStartEvidence JSONSignalsTrust JSONRiskMaterialsAll files

01Decision basis

Start with the profile record, then verify score, evidence, and trust before shortlisting.

Profile, score, evidence, trust

02Trial readiness

Use the sandbox plan and setup guide before copying commands or approving local setup.

Trial plan and setup

03Governance trail

Check lifecycle history, alternatives, and the dossier before hire, promotion, or credentials.

History, alternatives, dossier

Full file listOpen ordered resources when the decision needs more evidence.

9 required records stay in review order; companion links are grouped for context.

Required recordsRead these before install, hire, promotion, or credential access.

Profile recordIdentity and resource contract Score detailFit and recommendation score Evidence ledgerSignals, sources, and gaps Trust reviewPermissions and safety Trial guideSandbox task and criteria Setup guideInstall method and client notes Review historyPast reviews and changes AlternativesNearby candidates Readable dossierMarkdown decision brief

Companion links7 supporting records for context and discovery.

Short summaryShort summary ComparisonSide-by-side context Visibility reportVendor claim and evidence gaps claim.jsonCompanion link Resource mapSite resource map Site contextShared review context SitemapDiscovery index

Review order

01Decision recordIdentity, summary, and required review materials
02Score detailFit, recommendation, and decision scoring
03Evidence ledgerSource, reputation, and review gaps
04Full file listEvidence, setup, trust, trial, and history files

Use the compact page for quick review; open the full file list before recommending hire, install, promotion, or credential access.

Vendor path

Claim, verify, report, then feature

Vendor ownership and paid visibility options stay below the review package; evidence scores stay independent.

Start claim

Next stepClaim owner path

Submit public maintainer proof so corrections and paid visibility can be reviewed.

ReportEvidence gaps first

Open vendor visibility report

GuardrailExposure only

Paid placement can influence eligible exposure surfaces only after verification; trust, fit, safety, trial, and promotion scores remain evidence based.

done Indexed

The profile is discoverable with public profile, score, evidence, trust, install, and trial resources.

Open profile

current Claim owner path

Submit public maintainer proof so corrections and paid visibility can be reviewed.

Start claim

locked Verify evidence

Ownership, install metadata, safety posture, trial evidence, and public proof are checked independently.

Open visibility report

current Read visibility report

Use the report to see crawlable surfaces, comparison presence, evidence gaps, and the next fix.

View report

locked Apply for featured visibility

Featured exposure is available only after claim or verification readiness, and never changes scores.

Complete claim first

Commercial products and availabilityOpen claim, verification, report, and featured visibility options.

Claim profilefree

available · Start claim

Start claim

Verification reviewoptional paid

locked · Claim first

Claim first

Visibility reportoptional paid

available · Open report

Open report

Featured visibilitypaid

locked · Complete verification

Complete verification

Review route: OpenAI review tools can start with openai.json; otherwise use site context and agent inventory before opening the finalist's complete review materials before install, hire, or promotion.