A public status decision
A review action records a candidate status change such as publish, reject, request more data, promote, pause, retire, or return to review.
~/agentstafferAgentStaffer
Find, trial, compare, and govern AI agents before hiring
Insights / Review Actions
Review evidence health
Next best action: Open the highest-priority queue
Review Actions
Every rejection keeps its reason
Public audit trail for AgentStaffer listing review actions. Rejections, promotions, shortlists, and return-to-review decisions carry reason codes instead of disappearing from the market.
Total actions0
Rejections0
Promotions0
Shortlists0
Review action methodTrust primer, decision vocabulary, and creation contract stay available here.
Review actions are public decision evidence
Use this section to interpret the audit trail before ranking, excluding, publishing, or recommending a candidate.
Trust evidence, not a hidden edit
Each action preserves the reason code, reviewer, date, before/after status, candidate, evidence link, and recommendation guidance so future decisions can explain the change.
Cite the decision before ranking
Reference the public decision before excluding rejected candidates or treating publication as discovery rather than install approval.
Decision vocabulary
These are the status-changing decisions that should become public evidence when a reviewer changes a candidate's market state.
- PublishedCandidate passed enough source and metadata review to be discoverable.published
- RejectedCandidate failed a gate or lacks evidence required for responsible recommendation.rejected
- Request more dataCandidate needs additional source, install, safety, trial, or community evidence.request_more_data
- PromotedCandidate moved from trial or shortlist toward stronger market visibility.promoted
- PausedCandidate is temporarily held because risk, source, or freshness changed.paused
- RetiredCandidate is no longer suitable for active recommendation.retired
Create records with reason, reviewer, and evidence
Use this decision history when explaining a status change. Cite the reason code, reason, date, profile, setup guide, and evidence source before excluding, publishing, or promoting a candidate.
- Required input
- Listing and new status
- Useful context
- Reason, reviewer, and evidence source
- Allowed statuses
- pending, shortlisted, published, rejected
- Public record
- Decision, before/after status, reason code, reviewer, date, profile link, and policy guidance
{
"listingId": "github:example/project",
"status": "rejected",
"reason": "Install path cannot be verified and no sandbox trial evidence is available.",
"reviewer": "AgentStaffer reviewer",
"evidenceUrl": "https://agentstaffer.com/evidence-requests.json"
}
No status-changing decisions yet
Review Actions records decisions that change a listing status: publish, reject, request more data, promote, pause, retire, or return to review. A zero state means no public decision has been logged yet; it does not mean every candidate is approved.
Public review actions are trust evidence because they preserve the decision, reason code, reviewer, before/after status, candidate, date, and recommendation guidance instead of silently removing or promoting a profile.
- 1Open the evidence queue to find candidates missing source, install, risk, trial, or review evidence.
- 2Use the moderation rubric to decide whether the candidate should be published, shortlisted, rejected, or returned to review.
- 3Submit a status-changing decision through the listing status endpoint with reviewer, reason, and evidenceUrl.
- 4Re-open the review action guide and cite the new reason code when a reviewer asks why the candidate changed status.
Review support
Open Review actions JSON
Review links
Review actions stay readable; moderation policy and profile resource order stay linked here.
Supporting review linksLinks, review order, and page-specific notes remain available here.
Review actions JSONEvidence queue JSONModeration policy JSONEvidence ledger JSONResource catalog JSONReview guide JSONAgent inventory JSONSite context TXTSitemap XML
- 01Site contextShared review rules
- 02Review actionsOpen the focused review record
- 03Profile pageOpen the candidate page
- 04Profile resourcesEvidence, setup, trust, trial, and history files
Use the links and review path below for audit trail entries, review action guidance, and finalist profile resources before action.
Review route: OpenAI review tools can start with openai.json; otherwise use site context and agent inventory before opening the finalist's complete review materials before install, hire, or promotion.